H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs Javier Sanchez H2H: 2-2
Andrei Chesnokov and Javier Sanchez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Javier Sanchez leads 2–1 on clay, while Andrei Chesnokov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1995 Nice third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1995* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-3 6-3 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-3 2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1992* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 4-6 7-6(0) 7-5 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1991* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | Javier Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |