H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Andrei Chesnokov vs M. Woodforde H2H: 1-3
M. Woodforde holds a 3–1 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, M. Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, M. Woodforde won the 1993 Miami Masters third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1993* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-3 6-4 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1991* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | M. Woodforde | 6-2 2-6 7-6(2) | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-3 6-2 7-5 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1987* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Chesnokov | 6-3 6-3 | M. Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| M. Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Chesnokov | M. Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |