H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 3-1
Andrei Medvedev holds a 3–1 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrei Medvedev leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Stuttgart Masters second round 6-1 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1999* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-1 2-1 (ret.) | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1998* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Medvedev | 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| May 17, 1995* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-1 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1993* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrei Medvedev | 6-1 6-1 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |