H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 19:16 UTC
Andrei Medvedev vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 0-1
Davide Sanguinetti holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Medvedev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Davide Sanguinetti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2001 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(2) 6-7(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Davide Sanguinetti | 7-6(2) 6-7(2) 6-4 | Andrei Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Medvedev | #679 | #4 | 2,755 | 2,022 | 303 | 211 | 58.9% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Davide Sanguinetti | #1,080 | #42 | 874 | 1,771 | 157 | 233 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Medvedev | Davide Sanguinetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #227 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #6 | 1,943 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 39–26 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,769 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #35 | 1,775 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,708 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,722 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #95 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #58 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #48 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #156 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #65 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–27 | 27.0% | #91 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #46 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #107 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #270 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |