H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Alex Corretja H2H: 0-3
Alex Corretja holds a 3–0 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2002 Roland Garros quarterfinal 7-6(5) 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Alex Corretja | 7-6(5) 7-5 7-5 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1998* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Alex Corretja | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1994* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-4 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |