H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrei Pavel vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-2

Andrei Pavel and Cedric Pioline are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2001 Roland Garros round of 128 2-6 6-4 7-6(1) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Pavel
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #53 2-6 6-4 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Andrei Pavel #42 Match data May 30, 2001* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Cedric Pioline #15 7-6(5) 7-6(3) Andrei Pavel #25 Match data Oct 13, 2000* R16 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Andrei Pavel #37 6-4 1-6 6-1 Cedric Pioline #10 Match data Aug 24, 2000* R32 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Andrei Pavel #83 3-6 6-1 7-6(5) Cedric Pioline #5 Match data May 11, 2000* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Pavel — #13 1,550 1,897 249 252 49.7% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Cedric Pioline — #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Pavel Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–2 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1995 2–3 40.0% #214 1,517 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1996 3–3 50.0% #135 1,553 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1997 8–16 33.3% #118 1,534 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,848 0 0
24 1998 22–21 51.2% #68 1,615 0 1 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1999 28–24 53.8% #41 1,701 0 1 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 2000 33–27 55.0% #27 1,781 0 2 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 2001 29–26 52.7% #28 1,756 0 3 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2002 40–26 60.6% #26 1,801 0 3 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 2003 8–11 42.1% #69 1,754 0 3 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2004 31–24 56.4% #18 1,767 0 3 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2005 19–25 43.2% #80 1,632 0 3 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2006 13–21 38.2% #113 1,583 0 3 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 2007 12–13 48.0% #75 1,697 0 3 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5
34 2008 0–3 0.0% #1142 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 0–6 0.0% #600 1,561 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Pavel Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1997 4 5 9 44.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1998 9 4 13 69.2% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 2000 14 14 28 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2002 18 14 32 56.3% 17 9 26 65.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2004 17 13 30 56.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 112 221 49.3% 96 88 184 52.2% 21 26 47 44.7% 23 26 49 46.9% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 453/501 of Andrei Pavel's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Pavel Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 1/2 2.0 2.0 57.1% 67.5% 40.0% 66.7% 0.0% 55.7% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.8% 65.1% 51.5% 70.0% 22.2% 60.6% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 3/5 3.0 2.0 63.1% 57.7% 45.2% 59.3% 57.8% 52.9% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 3/6 1.0 1.3 62.1% 68.7% 50.3% 20.4% 38.4% 62.0% 37.1% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1997 22/24 3.3 2.8 61.1% 67.0% 45.0% 53.8% 46.4% 58.0% 36.2% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1998 39/43 5.2 2.2 63.7% 69.3% 49.4% 52.5% 40.8% 62.0% 39.1% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1999 47/52 3.9 2.0 67.9% 67.9% 49.3% 55.1% 39.1% 61.8% 38.6% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 2000 48/60 5.6 2.5 64.4% 68.9% 53.6% 51.2% 46.9% 63.2% 39.2% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2001 49/55 4.5 2.2 64.5% 69.3% 48.8% 51.5% 49.0% 61.6% 40.9% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2002 57/66 4.6 1.9 64.6% 70.4% 52.7% 57.5% 44.1% 63.8% 41.5% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 2003 18/19 5.1 2.3 62.7% 68.7% 48.1% 52.8% 36.3% 61.2% 32.0% 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 2004 53/55 5.7 1.8 64.0% 71.6% 52.7% 63.4% 39.6% 64.6% 37.0% 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 2005 44/44 7.4 1.8 64.4% 69.4% 45.9% 53.7% 39.0% 61.0% 34.8% 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 2006 33/34 3.5 1.8 62.9% 65.7% 49.2% 57.3% 37.7% 59.2% 36.0% 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 2007 25/25 4.9 2.0 65.2% 71.2% 45.9% 54.1% 46.6% 62.5% 37.9% 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
34 2008 3/3 3.3 1.0 64.9% 63.2% 47.3% 33.3% 31.3% 56.6% 24.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 6/6 3.3 3.5 62.5% 63.5% 46.3% 40.8% 41.7% 56.2% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 453/501 4.9 2.1 64.3% 69.0% 49.7% 54.7% 42.4% 61.9% 37.8% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.1% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Pavel Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1483 100.6 -1.56 -0.64 0.656 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1501 107.8 +3.03 -2.92 0.749 46.4% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1995 1517 112.5 +0.03 -0.76 0.679 42.8% +11 — — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.12 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1996 1554 122.2 +1.88 -0.17 0.977 48.3% — +43 — 56.3% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.06 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1997 1535 122.9 -2.36 -1.14 0.861 47.2% -5 +26 +89 40.3% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -0.24 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1998 1615 132.6 +0.09 +0.60 1.027 50.4% +60 -42 -66 52.9% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 9–3 (75%) 103.7 +1.70 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1999 1702 137.5 +0.71 +0.50 1.011 50.0% -5 -61 -94 52.0% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.1 -0.85 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 2000 1782 144.5 +1.27 +1.94 1.066 51.2% -50 -2 -106 55.4% +0.41 11–12 (48%) 11–16 (41%) 100.3 -2.01 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 2001 1756 151.0 -0.25 +3.37 1.067 51.3% +45 -38 -112 54.9% +0.47 8–12 (40%) 12–17 (41%) 94.1 -1.11 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2002 1802 143.8 +1.52 +3.53 1.147 52.3% -23 +36 -142 57.1% +0.59 10–11 (48%) 13–16 (45%) 94.0 +0.89 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 2003 1755 132.4 +0.24 -2.79 0.825 46.9% -7 — — 41.5% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 103.7 -1.38 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2004 1767 147.4 +1.25 +1.53 1.046 50.9% +40 +32 -118 55.6% +0.29 10–10 (50%) 20–12 (63%) 101.4 -0.83 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 2005 1632 121.9 -1.28 -2.44 0.892 48.1% -7 +125 +10 44.1% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 12–14 (46%) 96.3 +2.51 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 2006 1584 120.6 -2.59 -1.35 0.883 47.6% -19 +78 +51 42.5% -0.66 2–7 (22%) 9–7 (56%) 96.1 -0.09 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 2007 1697 129.0 +0.11 +0.45 1.012 50.4% -42 +17 -81 52.3% -0.09 2–8 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 95.0 -0.88 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
34 2008 1646 103.9 -1.76 -2.42 0.573 41.6% -43 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1561 104.5 -2.84 -2.12 0.666 43.2% — — — 18.8% -1.94 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 142.6 +0.09 +0.76 0.993 49.9% +2 +18 -67 50.8% +0.06 78–97 (45%) 103–107 (49%) 95.4 -0.60 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.