H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 1-1
Andrei Pavel and Guillermo Canas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2005 Rome Masters second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 7-5 6-2 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 6-4 5-7 7-6(3) | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |