H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1
Andrei Pavel holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Andrei Pavel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2001 Canada Masters fourth round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2001* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Pavel | 6-0 6-2 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Sep 30, 1999* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1995* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |