H2H data updated: 2026-10-24 00:00 UTC

Andrei Pavel vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0

Andrei Pavel holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Pavel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2004 US Open round of 32 6-4 6-2 1-6 1-6 6-4.

ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Pavel #18 6-4 6-2 1-6 1-6 6-4 Hyung-Taik Lee #74 Match data Sep 5, 2004* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrei Pavel #890 #13 1,550 1,897 249 252 49.7% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Pavel Hyung-Taik Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–2 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0
20 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0
21 1995 2–3 40.0% #214 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 3–3 50.0% #135 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1997 8–16 33.3% #118 1,534 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0
24 1998 22–21 51.2% #68 1,615 0 1 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0
25 1999 28–24 53.8% #41 1,701 0 1 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0
26 2000 33–27 55.0% #27 1,781 0 2 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0
27 2001 29–26 52.7% #28 1,756 0 3 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1
28 2002 40–26 60.6% #26 1,801 0 3 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1
29 2003 8–11 42.1% #69 1,754 0 3 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1
30 2004 31–24 56.4% #18 1,767 0 3 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1
31 2005 19–25 43.2% #80 1,632 0 3 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1
32 2006 13–21 38.2% #113 1,583 0 3 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1
33 2007 12–13 48.0% #75 1,697 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1
34 2008 0–3 0.0% #1142 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 0–6 0.0% #600 1,561 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrei Pavel Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 4 5 9 44.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1998 9 4 13 69.2% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2000 14 14 28 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 18 14 32 56.3% 17 9 26 65.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 17 13 30 56.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2007 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 112 221 49.3% 96 88 184 52.2% 21 26 47 44.7% 23 26 49 46.9% — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 453/501 of Andrei Pavel's and 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Andrei Pavel Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 1/2 2.0 2.0 57.1% 67.5% 40.0% 66.7% 0.0% 55.7% 29.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.8% 65.1% 51.5% 70.0% 22.2% 60.6% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 3/5 3.0 2.0 63.1% 57.7% 45.2% 59.3% 57.8% 52.9% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 3/6 1.0 1.3 62.1% 68.7% 50.3% 20.4% 38.4% 62.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 22/24 3.3 2.8 61.1% 67.0% 45.0% 53.8% 46.4% 58.0% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1998 39/43 5.2 2.2 63.7% 69.3% 49.4% 52.5% 40.8% 62.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1999 47/52 3.9 2.0 67.9% 67.9% 49.3% 55.1% 39.1% 61.8% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2000 48/60 5.6 2.5 64.4% 68.9% 53.6% 51.2% 46.9% 63.2% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 49/55 4.5 2.2 64.5% 69.3% 48.8% 51.5% 49.0% 61.6% 40.9% 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2%
28 2002 57/66 4.6 1.9 64.6% 70.4% 52.7% 57.5% 44.1% 63.8% 41.5% 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2%
29 2003 18/19 5.1 2.3 62.7% 68.7% 48.1% 52.8% 36.3% 61.2% 32.0% 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9%
30 2004 53/55 5.7 1.8 64.0% 71.6% 52.7% 63.4% 39.6% 64.6% 37.0% 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4%
31 2005 44/44 7.4 1.8 64.4% 69.4% 45.9% 53.7% 39.0% 61.0% 34.8% 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1%
32 2006 33/34 3.5 1.8 62.9% 65.7% 49.2% 57.3% 37.7% 59.2% 36.0% 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6%
33 2007 25/25 4.9 2.0 65.2% 71.2% 45.9% 54.1% 46.6% 62.5% 37.9% 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8%
34 2008 3/3 3.3 1.0 64.9% 63.2% 47.3% 33.3% 31.3% 56.6% 24.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 6/6 3.3 3.5 62.5% 63.5% 46.3% 40.8% 41.7% 56.2% 29.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 453/501 4.9 2.1 64.3% 69.0% 49.7% 54.7% 42.4% 61.9% 37.8% — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.5% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrei Pavel Hyung-Taik Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1992 1483 100.6 -1.56 -0.64 0.656 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15
20 1994 1501 107.8 +3.03 -2.92 0.749 46.4% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10
21 1995 1517 112.5 +0.03 -0.76 0.679 42.8% +11 — — 44.4% -0.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1554 122.2 +1.88 -0.17 0.977 48.3% — +43 — 56.3% +0.38 0–2 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1997 1535 122.9 -2.36 -1.14 0.861 47.2% -5 +26 +89 40.3% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -0.24 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19
24 1998 1615 132.6 +0.09 +0.60 1.027 50.4% +60 -42 -66 52.9% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 9–3 (75%) 103.7 +1.70 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44
25 1999 1702 137.5 +0.71 +0.50 1.011 50.0% -5 -61 -94 52.0% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.1 -0.85 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31
26 2000 1782 144.5 +1.27 +1.94 1.066 51.2% -50 -2 -106 55.4% +0.41 11–12 (48%) 11–16 (41%) 100.3 -2.01 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15
27 2001 1756 151.0 -0.25 +3.37 1.067 51.3% +45 -38 -112 54.9% +0.47 8–12 (40%) 12–17 (41%) 94.1 -1.11 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24
28 2002 1802 143.8 +1.52 +3.53 1.147 52.3% -23 +36 -142 57.1% +0.59 10–11 (48%) 13–16 (45%) 94.0 +0.89 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09
29 2003 1755 132.4 +0.24 -2.79 0.825 46.9% -7 — — 41.5% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 103.7 -1.38 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85
30 2004 1767 147.4 +1.25 +1.53 1.046 50.9% +40 +32 -118 55.6% +0.29 10–10 (50%) 20–12 (63%) 101.4 -0.83 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52
31 2005 1632 121.9 -1.28 -2.44 0.892 48.1% -7 +125 +10 44.1% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 12–14 (46%) 96.3 +2.51 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89
32 2006 1584 120.6 -2.59 -1.35 0.883 47.6% -19 +78 +51 42.5% -0.66 2–7 (22%) 9–7 (56%) 96.1 -0.09 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14
33 2007 1697 129.0 +0.11 +0.45 1.012 50.4% -42 +17 -81 52.3% -0.09 2–8 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 95.0 -0.88 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05
34 2008 1646 103.9 -1.76 -2.42 0.573 41.6% -43 — — 28.6% -1.57 0–1 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2009 1561 104.5 -2.84 -2.12 0.666 43.2% — — — 18.8% -1.94 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 142.6 +0.09 +0.76 0.993 49.9% +2 +18 -67 50.8% +0.06 78–97 (45%) 103–107 (49%) 95.4 -0.60 — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.