H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Igor Andreev H2H: 0-2
Igor Andreev holds a 2–0 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Igor Andreev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2008 Australian Open first round 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) 6-3 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 6-2 6-1 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |