H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Andrei Pavel holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Pavel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2000 Canada Masters second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2000* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Andrei Pavel | 6-2 6-2 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |