H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-1
Andrei Pavel holds a 2–1 lead over Lleyton Hewitt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrei Pavel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2004 Rome Masters third round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2004* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrei Pavel | 6-4 7-5 | Lleyton Hewitt | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lleyton Hewitt | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Lleyton Hewitt | #636 | #1 | 5,205 | 2,159 | 564 | 241 | 70.1% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 30 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Lleyton Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #100 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 53–15 | 77.9% | #7 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #1 | 2,116 | 1 | 12 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 61–16 | 79.2% | #1 | 2,062 | 2 | 17 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 29–10 | 74.4% | #17 | 1,939 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 64–16 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,076 | 2 | 23 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 24 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #20 | 1,964 | 2 | 25 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #21 | 1,925 | 2 | 26 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #67 | 1,936 | 2 | 26 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #22 | 1,956 | 2 | 27 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #54 | 1,907 | 2 | 28 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #186 | 1,817 | 2 | 28 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #83 | 1,867 | 2 | 28 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,884 | 2 | 28 |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,841 | 2 | 30 |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,715 | 2 | 30 |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #633 | 1,727 | 2 | 30 |