H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Andrei Pavel vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 2-4

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 4–2 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Andrei Pavel leads 2–1 on clay, while Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2004 Rome Masters second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrei Pavel
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 15, 2007 Madrid Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Andrei Pavel #82 7-6(8) 7-5 Nicolas Lapentti #106 Match data
May 5, 2004* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Andrei Pavel #30 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #67 Match data
Apr 15, 2004* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Andrei Pavel #41 6-4 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #62 Match data
Jun 30, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Nicolas Lapentti #27 3-6 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 6-2 Andrei Pavel #21 Match data
Mar 4, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #44 6-3 4-6 6-1 Andrei Pavel #47 Match data
Oct 30, 1997* Bogota ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #83 6-2 6-2 Andrei Pavel #97 Match data
Aug 27, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #87 6-4 5-0 (ret.) Andrei Pavel #88 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Andrei Pavel #890 #13 1,550 1,904 249 248 50.1% 0 1 0 0 2 3
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrei Pavel Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 0–1 0.0% #489 1,487 0 0 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1994 1–1 50.0% #408 1,505 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1995 2–3 40.0% #214 1,520 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 1996 3–2 60.0% #135 1,561 0 0 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 1997 8–16 33.3% #118 1,538 0 0 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 1998 22–21 51.2% #68 1,616 0 1 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 1999 28–24 53.8% #41 1,701 0 1 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2000 33–26 55.9% #27 1,788 0 2 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2001 29–26 52.7% #28 1,754 0 3 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2002 40–26 60.6% #26 1,801 0 3 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2003 8–11 42.1% #69 1,778 0 3 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2004 31–23 57.4% #18 1,772 0 3 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2005 19–25 43.2% #80 1,633 0 3 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2006 13–21 38.2% #113 1,593 0 3 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2007 12–13 48.0% #75 1,698 0 3 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2008 0–3 0.0% #1142 1,646 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2009 0–6 0.0% #600 1,561 0 3 — — — — — — —