H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrei Pavel vs Tim Henman H2H: 1-2
Tim Henman holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Pavel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Andrei Pavel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrei Pavel won the 2004 Hamburg Masters third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Andrei Pavel | 6-2 6-2 | Tim Henman | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2003* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Carpet | Tim Henman | 6-2 7-6(6) 7-6(2) | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Andrei Pavel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrei Pavel | #890 | #13 | 1,550 | 1,904 | 249 | 248 | 50.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrei Pavel | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #68 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #41 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,788 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2002 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2003 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #69 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2004 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #18 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #80 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | 2006 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #113 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2007 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1142 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2009 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |