H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Andres Gomez vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 1-4

Eddie Dibbs holds a 4–1 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1981 Quito semifinal 7-6 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andres Gomez
ECU Age 66 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Eddie Dibbs
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eddie Dibbs #29 7-6 2-6 6-3 Andres Gomez #46 Match data Nov 7, 1981* SF Quito ATP 250 Clay
Andres Gomez #74 6-1 7-6 Eddie Dibbs #20 Match data Jul 16, 1981* R32 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Eddie Dibbs #9 3-6 6-4 6-0 Andres Gomez #51 Match data Aug 6, 1980* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Eddie Dibbs #10 6-1 6-3 Andres Gomez #64 Match data Feb 17, 1980* F Sarasota ATP 250 Clay
Eddie Dibbs #8 6-3 7-5 Andres Gomez Match data Jul 31, 1979* R64 North Conway ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andres Gomez #1,171 #4 2,005 2,094 502 261 65.8% 1 0 0 3 17 21
Eddie Dibbs #798 #5 0 2,169 605 262 69.8% 0 0 0 1 21 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Dibbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 11–8 57.9% #61 1,639 0 0 1970 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
20 1980 36–23 61.0% #42 1,802 0 0 1971 7–4 63.6% — 1,601 0 0
21 1981 36–21 63.2% #37 1,901 0 1 1972 5–9 35.7% — 1,608 0 0
22 1982 51–25 67.1% #15 1,887 0 3 1973 40–19 67.8% #28 1,857 0 3
23 1983 43–20 68.3% #14 1,960 0 4 1974 61–29 67.8% #22 1,909 0 4
24 1984 60–13 82.2% #5 2,074 0 9 1975 53–25 67.9% #18 2,055 0 6
25 1985 26–14 65.0% #15 1,971 0 10 1976 83–28 74.8% #9 2,058 0 10
26 1986 57–20 74.0% #10 1,898 0 14 1977 77–28 73.3% #7 2,056 0 13
27 1987 46–18 71.9% #11 1,913 0 15 1978 82–27 75.2% #6 1,999 0 17
28 1988 34–18 65.4% #24 1,808 0 15 1979 62–21 74.7% #10 2,039 0 18
29 1989 32–17 65.3% #17 1,869 0 17 1980 49–21 70.0% #12 1,930 0 20
30 1990 38–27 58.5% #6 1,719 1 20 1981 41–17 70.7% #25 1,977 0 22
31 1991 20–19 51.3% #70 1,720 1 21 1982 26–18 59.1% #55 1,797 0 22
32 1992 10–12 45.5% #179 1,675 1 21 1983 16–10 61.5% #90 1,819 0 22
33 1993 2–6 25.0% #402 1,606 1 21 1984 1–5 16.7% #351 1,750 0 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Dibbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 30 17 47 63.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1971 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 32 16 48 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1982 3 2 5 60.0% 38 16 54 70.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1973 17 5 22 77.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1983 16 6 22 72.7% 21 10 31 67.7% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1974 14 8 22 63.6% 30 12 42 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
24 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 35 5 40 87.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1975 7 6 13 53.8% 36 13 49 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
25 1985 11 3 14 78.6% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 61 15 76 80.3% — — — — 16 10 26 61.5%
26 1986 18 5 23 78.3% 34 9 43 79.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1977 20 5 25 80.0% 43 13 56 76.8% — — — — 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 23 8 31 74.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1978 8 3 11 72.7% 40 9 49 81.6% — — — — 34 15 49 69.4%
28 1988 17 9 26 65.4% 15 6 21 71.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 15 5 20 75.0% 37 10 47 78.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5%
29 1989 12 7 19 63.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 34 9 43 79.1% — — — — 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1990 10 10 20 50.0% 24 6 30 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 32 10 42 76.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1991 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 6 1 7 85.7% 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 72 202 64.4% 304 135 439 69.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 58 46 104 55.8% — 104 48 152 68.4% 376 133 509 73.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 119 75 194 61.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andres Gomez Eddie Dibbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1640 133.9 — — — — — +23 — 53.3% +0.13 5–1 (83%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.20 1970 1523 107.1 — — — — — +35 — 66.7% +1.33 — — — +0.27
20 1980 1803 150.2 — — — — -218 +37 -239 56.6% +0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.09 1971 1602 117.2 — — — — — +55 — 59.1% +0.36 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1981 1902 159.2 — — — — -233 +53 — 61.4% +0.73 11–11 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.54 1972 1608 116.6 — — — — -61 +29 — 42.9% -0.63 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.10
22 1982 1887 151.8 — — — — -96 +44 — 60.2% +0.59 18–10 (64%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.90 1973 1858 140.0 — — — — +9 -48 -291 63.2% +0.94 5–5 (50%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.92
23 1983 1961 152.2 — — — — -52 +15 — 66.2% +0.91 8–8 (50%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.48 1974 1910 146.5 — — — — -22 +35 -294 63.6% +0.99 16–10 (62%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.77
24 1984 2075 162.7 — — — — -57 +57 -408 74.2% +1.57 14–6 (70%) 28–8 (78%) — -0.36 1975 2056 157.2 — — — — -104 +48 — 65.7% +1.13 11–8 (58%) 3–9 (25%) — -5.91
25 1985 1972 156.7 — — — — +24 +63 — 59.6% +0.84 8–6 (57%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.07 1976 2058 167.1 — — — — -86 +115 — 65.7% +1.08 27–8 (77%) 22–17 (56%) — -5.66
26 1986 1899 151.6 — — — — +57 +84 — 65.3% +0.96 19–3 (86%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.32 1977 2056 168.2 — — — — +21 +52 — 67.2% +1.16 18–9 (67%) 14–11 (56%) — -7.02
27 1987 1914 153.2 — — — — +9 +79 -210 65.7% +0.91 13–5 (72%) 19–11 (63%) — -0.88 1978 2000 165.9 — — — — +10 +123 — 69.4% +1.41 20–10 (67%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.88
28 1988 1808 143.7 — — — — -7 +174 — 59.9% +0.53 14–6 (70%) 13–4 (76%) — +0.08 1979 2039 164.3 — — — — -15 +95 — 68.0% +1.20 17–6 (74%) 10–5 (67%) — -4.95
29 1989 1869 146.8 — — — — -39 +112 — 60.4% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 13–12 (52%) — -1.82 1980 1931 156.9 — — — — -20 +110 — 64.6% +1.22 14–4 (78%) 9–3 (75%) — -1.24
30 1990 1719 152.3 — — — — -59 +350 — 56.2% +0.37 14–14 (50%) 22–13 (63%) — +1.72 1981 1978 155.3 — — — — -115 +66 — 66.4% +1.15 10–8 (56%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.84
31 1991 1720 132.4 +1.72 -0.14 1.075 51.3% -41 +210 — 52.1% +0.27 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +1.82 1982 1797 140.9 — — — — -37 +129 — 58.8% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.22
32 1992 1676 124.1 +0.46 -0.28 0.968 49.8% -20 +116 — 50.0% +0.13 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.39 1983 1820 147.9 — — — — — +84 — 55.0% +0.37 9–1 (90%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.74
33 1993 1607 107.6 -1.77 +0.32 0.915 48.6% — +122 — 38.1% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27 1984 1750 119.5 — — — — — +67 — 33.3% -1.00 0–3 (0%) — — -0.74
Career — 2094 156.6 +0.93 -0.14 1.018 50.5% -35 +90 -295 61.4% +0.71 154–97 (61%) 181–105 (63%) 109.8 -1.07 — 2169 162.2 — — — — -26 +76 -293 64.8% +1.05 151–81 (65%) 113–88 (56%) 105.5 -3.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.