H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Aslan Karatsev H2H: 1-1
Andrey Rublev and Aslan Karatsev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on grass, while Aslan Karatsev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2023 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Andrey Rublev | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 7-5 | Aslan Karatsev | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2021* | Dubai | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Aslan Karatsev | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Aslan Karatsev | #369 | #14 | 2,633 | 1,985 | 78 | 86 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Aslan Karatsev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2021 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,869 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | 2022 | 17–29 | 37.0% | #59 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #287 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 |