H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Bernard Tomic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Andrey Rublev vs Bernard Tomic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |