H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Dudi Sela H2H: 1-1
Andrey Rublev and Dudi Sela are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dudi Sela leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dudi Sela won the 2016 Istanbul third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016* | Istanbul | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dudi Sela | 6-3 6-2 | Andrey Rublev | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2015* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Dudi Sela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Dudi Sela | #1,031 | #29 | 1,397 | 1,802 | 120 | 168 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Dudi Sela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2009 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #75 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #83 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2012 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2013 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #73 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #100 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #96 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #67 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #236 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |