H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs John Millman H2H: 1-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2019 Shanghai Masters third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-2 6-0 | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 373 | 212 | 63.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | John Millman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #16 | 1,883 | 0 | 17 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |