H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Norbert Gombos H2H: 1-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 1–0 lead over Norbert Gombos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrey Rublev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2020 Vienna third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2020* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-2 | Norbert Gombos | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2015 | Barcelona | ATP 500 | Q2 | Clay | Andrey Rublev | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Norbert Gombos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Norbert Gombos | #370 | #80 | 912 | 1,794 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrey Rublev | Norbert Gombos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #132 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #88 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #118 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |