H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Andrey Rublev vs Zhizhen Zhang H2H: 4-0
Andrey Rublev holds a 4–0 lead over Zhizhen Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrey Rublev leads 4–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrey Rublev won the 2025 ABN AMRO Open third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025* | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-4 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2024* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-4 6-3 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2024* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2022* | Astana | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andrey Rublev | 6-3 6-2 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrey Rublev | #16 | #5 | 6,400 | 2,186 | 372 | 212 | 63.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Andrey Rublev | Zhizhen Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #185 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #39 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #23 | 1,974 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 41–10 | 80.4% | #8 | 2,134 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 2,034 | 0 | 12 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 56–25 | 69.1% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 14 | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 43–27 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,864 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #16 | 1,871 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |