H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Andy Murray vs Milos Raonic H2H: 11-5
Andy Murray holds a 11–5 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Andy Murray leads 7–4 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Cincinnati Masters fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
11
–
5
16 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2020* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-2 6-2 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Nov 21, 2016* | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | 5-7 7-6(5) 7-6(9) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Nov 5, 2016* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | (w/o) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-3 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Andy Murray | 6-4 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2016* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Andy Murray | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Apr 16, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Andy Murray | 6-2 6-0 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jan 30, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Andy Murray | 4-6 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| May 9, 2015* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Andy Murray | 6-4 7-5 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Nov 9, 2014 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-3 7-5 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2012* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Sep 4, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2012* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Milos Raonic | (w/o) | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Milos Raonic | 6-4 7-6(3) | Andy Murray | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andy Murray | (w/o) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Murray | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |