H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Andy Murray vs Tim Smyczek H2H: 1-0
Andy Murray holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Smyczek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Murray leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2010 Los Angeles fourth round 6-1 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2010* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Andy Murray | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Tim Smyczek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
| Tim Smyczek | #862 | #68 | 688 | 1,768 | 43 | 85 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Murray | Tim Smyczek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #89 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 | 2014 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 | 2015 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #140 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 | 2018 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #355 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |