H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andy Roddick vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 2-1
Andy Roddick holds a 2–1 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2007 Indianapolis semifinal 6-4 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2007 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-4 7-6(1) | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2007* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-5 6-1 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2006* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Andy Roddick | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andy Roddick | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |