H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Angel Gimenez vs Andrew Pattison H2H: 0-2

Andrew Pattison holds a 2–0 lead over Angel Gimenez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrew Pattison leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrew Pattison won the 1981 Wimbledon round of 64 4-6 7-6 6-7 6-1 6-4.

ESP Age 70 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 77 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrew Pattison 4-6 7-6 6-7 6-1 6-4 Angel Gimenez #83 Match data Jun 26, 1981* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Andrew Pattison 6-2 6-1 Angel Gimenez #94 Match data Oct 31, 1980* R16 Cologne ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Angel Gimenez #806 #41 0 1,779 86 106 44.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Andrew Pattison 1,979 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Angel Gimenez Andrew Pattison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1975 2–3 40.0% #193 1,518 0 0
20 1976 8–7 53.3% #131 1,586 0 0
21 1977 1–1 50.0% #197 1,602 0 0
22 1978 12–10 54.5% #42 1,604 0 0
23 1979 8–21 27.6% #195 1,596 0 0
24 1980 17–14 54.8% #86 1,662 0 2
25 1981 26–26 50.0% #92 1,657 0 2
26 1982 10–19 34.5% #96 1,559 0 2
27 1983 2–4 33.3% #164 1,559 0 2
28 1984 0–1 0.0% #745 1,541 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Angel Gimenez Andrew Pattison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 1968 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1976 8 7 15 53.3% 1969 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1972 6 6 12 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
24 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 10 7 17 58.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5%
25 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 22 20 42 52.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 14 4 18 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1982 10 17 27 37.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1983 2 4 6 33.3% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
28 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 11 9 20 55.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
29 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1979 13 7 20 65.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
31 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8%
32 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
34 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 11 17 35.3% 78 85 163 47.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 96 79 175 54.9% 63 60 123 51.2% 30 28 58 51.7% 67 70 137 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Angel Gimenez Andrew Pattison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1975 1519 114.2 +43 45.5% -0.27 0–1 1–0 0.00 1968 1450 97.3 -2 0.0% -3.00 -0.04
20 1976 1587 124.1 +31 50.0% +0.21 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +1.99 1969 1473 107.1 50.0% +0.50 -0.07
21 1977 1603 109.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.30 1970 1495 118.6 +83 +19 -13 35.2% -0.83 0–3 (0%) -0.35
22 1978 1604 108.8 -52 +40 51.0% -0.20 4–3 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.30 1971 1586 125.4 +32 -50 49.0% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.46
23 1979 1597 136.8 -94 +47 30.9% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) -1.61 1972 1840 143.1 -75 -2 -227 62.3% +0.95 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 109.4 +0.21
24 1980 1662 121.7 -174 +53 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 1–2 (33%) 105.4 +3.06 1973 1772 131.9 -44 +3 -85 48.5% -0.10 8–7 (53%) 7–11 (39%) 99.9 -2.65
25 1981 1657 143.8 -163 +90 50.4% +0.15 9–9 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 98.8 -0.77 1974 1923 152.3 -14 -60 66.0% +1.30 8–3 (73%) 4–1 (80%) 109.2 -1.00
26 1982 1560 125.1 +78 34.3% -1.19 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 0.00 1975 1934 141.2 -77 -17 -175 54.2% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 99.9 -1.91
27 1983 1559 113.8 +58 30.8% -0.77 1–0 0–1 -0.02 1976 1821 146.5 +15 42.5% -0.37 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 103.6 -2.94
28 1984 1542 98.9 33.3% -0.67 0–1 +0.14 1977 1774 143.4 +32 +16 -27 51.1% +0.14 10–9 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 105.5 -2.22
29 1978 1708 135.0 +19 +74 47.2% +0.19 4–3 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 101.7 +1.01
30 1979 1777 133.3 +32 -64 -59 49.1% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 104.1 -0.12
31 1980 1732 146.9 +51 -26 +6 50.0% +0.07 4–3 (57%) 6–11 (35%) 97.6 -3.35
32 1981 1689 126.4 +45 -39 40.5% -0.60 4–2 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.5 +0.16
33 1982 1622 121.6 +11 36.1% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +0.19
34 1983 1603 95.4 0.0% -4.00 +0.25
Career 1779 135.5 -118 +63 43.9% -0.41 35–30 (54%) 16–15 (52%) 104.5 +3.06 1979 145.1 +3 -7 -92 50.3% +0.11 78–59 (57%) 71–64 (53%) 108.6 -2.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.