H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Dick Crealy H2H: 1-1
Antonio Munoz and Dick Crealy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Antonio Munoz leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dick Crealy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Antonio Munoz won the 1978 Hartford fourth round 4-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1978* | Hartford | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Antonio Munoz | 4-6 6-3 7-6 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| May 3, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Dick Crealy | 6-2 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |