H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Dick Stockton H2H: 0-2
Dick Stockton holds a 2–0 lead over Antonio Munoz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dick Stockton leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dick Stockton won the 1973 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-0 6-2 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1972* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dick Stockton | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dick Stockton | #808 | #8 | 0 | 2,122 | 386 | 267 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Dick Stockton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,917 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 58–26 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,993 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #138 | 1,714 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #98 | 1,750 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,640 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,602 | 0 | 8 |