H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Julian Ganzabal H2H: 0-1
Julian Ganzabal holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Munoz in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julian Ganzabal leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julian Ganzabal won the 1972 Buenos Aires fourth round 2-6 7-6 6-1 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 1972* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Julian Ganzabal | 2-6 7-6 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julian Ganzabal | #266 | #69 | 0 | 1,725 | 53 | 69 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Julian Ganzabal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #273 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |