H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Milan Holecek H2H: 1-1
Antonio Munoz and Milan Holecek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Milan Holecek leads 1–0 on clay, while Antonio Munoz leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Antonio Munoz won the 1973 Eastbourne third round 8-9 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 82
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1973* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Antonio Munoz | 8-9 6-4 6-4 | Milan Holecek | Match data |
| Jul 8, 1971* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Milan Holecek | 6-4 6-2 8-6 | Antonio Munoz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milan Holecek | #322 | #71 | 0 | 1,721 | 116 | 157 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Milan Holecek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 27–28 | 49.1% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–31 | 40.4% | #87 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #90 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #102 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #225 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |