H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Antonio Munoz vs Ray Keldie H2H: 1-0
Antonio Munoz holds a 1–0 lead over Ray Keldie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Antonio Munoz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Antonio Munoz won the 1974 Toronto second round 6-1 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1974* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Antonio Munoz | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Ray Keldie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Munoz | #826 | #74 | 1 | 1,684 | 105 | 173 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ray Keldie | #190 | #113 | 0 | 1,622 | 64 | 106 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Antonio Munoz | Ray Keldie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #83 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–23 | 32.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #123 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #190 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #233 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #594 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |