H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Antonio Veic vs Alex Bogomolov Jr H2H: 0-1

Alex Bogomolov Jr holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Veic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Bogomolov Jr leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Bogomolov Jr won the 2011 Zagreb round of 32 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Antonio Veic
CRO Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Alex Bogomolov Jr
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alex Bogomolov Jr 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Antonio Veic #204 Match data Feb 3, 2011* R32 Zagreb ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Antonio Veic #888 #119 468 1,718 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alex Bogomolov Jr — — — 1,893 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Antonio Veic Alex Bogomolov Jr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #271 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 2–1 66.7% #220 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 1–3 25.0% #191 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2011 4–6 40.0% #159 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 3–5 37.5% #131 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2013 0–5 0.0% #217 1,582 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 0–1 0.0% #473 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Antonio Veic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2009 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2004 7 13 20 35.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 11 18 29 37.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 5 9 14 35.7% 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — — 56 80 136 41.2% 1 9 10 10.0% 10 13 23 43.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/32 of Antonio Veic's and 163/165 of Alex Bogomolov Jr's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Antonio Veic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2008 1/1 0.0 5.0 52.2% 62.9% 34.4% 64.3% 66.7% 49.3% 38.5% 2003 12/13 2.6 3.1 67.5% 67.5% 46.1% 54.2% 49.0% 60.5% 36.6%
21 2009 3/3 6.3 3.7 56.6% 69.5% 52.4% 71.5% 56.7% 62.0% 35.8% 2004 27/27 1.9 2.7 68.3% 65.6% 49.8% 53.2% 50.5% 59.8% 36.4%
22 2010 4/4 2.3 1.0 66.2% 63.9% 57.3% 55.4% 62.6% 61.4% 36.5% 2005 4/4 2.0 2.8 66.8% 56.9% 44.7% 56.1% 45.4% 52.5% 38.0%
23 2011 10/10 4.5 3.1 58.5% 63.2% 42.4% 48.2% 54.4% 54.3% 39.1% 2006 4/4 2.8 5.8 64.7% 63.7% 44.6% 40.0% 82.3% 56.9% 32.3%
24 2012 8/8 1.4 2.8 64.3% 68.9% 47.9% 50.4% 47.1% 61.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 5/5 0.8 3.0 66.3% 56.3% 43.2% 30.8% 39.3% 51.0% 31.6% 2008 2/2 2.0 2.0 65.7% 48.8% 44.4% 43.8% 16.7% 47.3% 32.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 6/6 1.0 1.7 66.6% 60.9% 54.8% 43.2% 65.6% 58.8% 35.1%
27 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 65.6% 62.5% 28.6% 55.6% 25.0% 50.8% 33.3% 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.1% 68.1% 59.1% 33.3% 20.0% 65.2% 32.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 48/48 2.5 2.8 69.9% 66.8% 51.0% 65.5% 39.6% 61.9% 38.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 37/38 2.2 2.8 71.0% 64.7% 48.1% 55.9% 37.1% 59.9% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 14/14 2.8 3.5 69.2% 63.6% 53.2% 57.2% 54.0% 60.3% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 8/8 1.0 3.5 64.3% 55.6% 50.1% 54.0% 46.4% 53.4% 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Antonio Veic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1485 99.4 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.50 — — — +0.05
19 2007 1453 90.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 113.1 — — — — +20 — — 44.4% -0.22 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
20 2008 1445 99.2 -0.85 -5.19 0.758 44.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.17 2003 1539 118.9 -1.69 -0.75 0.926 48.5% +13 — — 44.8% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.07
21 2009 1469 110.3 +0.50 +0.45 0.943 49.3% +81 — — 50.0% -0.13 2–0 1–1 — -0.06 2004 1576 133.8 -2.72 +1.15 0.905 48.4% +24 -69 -26 40.0% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 94.1 -0.88
22 2010 1532 107.8 -2.29 -0.16 0.946 48.7% +46 — — 30.0% -0.50 1–0 0–2 — -0.20 2005 1533 101.5 -1.82 -1.12 0.799 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.89 — 0–1 — +0.64
23 2011 1671 121.9 -3.75 +0.44 0.855 46.8% -50 +63 — 34.6% -0.81 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.16 2006 1545 107.7 -1.35 -0.35 0.749 45.5% +82 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
24 2012 1642 118.3 -1.65 -0.78 1.045 50.7% -22 +89 — 42.1% +0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.12 2007 1518 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1583 108.5 -3.24 -2.73 0.645 41.5% — +148 — 16.7% -2.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.12 2008 1508 99.4 -1.47 -0.62 0.621 40.1% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — -0.03
26 2014 1599 115.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1579 119.2 -1.75 -2.00 0.851 47.6% +61 — — 46.2% -0.85 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
27 2015 1549 102.7 -1.93 -0.71 0.678 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2010 1548 117.6 -1.34 -1.15 0.946 48.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1859 145.8 -0.80 +1.25 1.001 50.0% +1 — -218 52.1% +0.24 13–4 (76%) 9–13 (41%) 104.5 +1.22
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1709 143.0 -2.62 +0.95 0.940 48.8% +66 -252 -121 38.4% -0.73 2–9 (18%) 3–8 (27%) 88.2 -0.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1668 125.2 -1.08 -0.73 0.929 48.7% +26 — — 40.0% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 96.1 +0.21
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1611 121.3 -5.50 +1.04 0.765 45.4% +61 — — 29.4% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.68
Career — 1718 116.9 -2.42 -0.65 0.868 47.2% +14 +92 — 32.9% -0.89 7–6 (54%) 1–9 (10%) 97.1 +0.56 — 1894 134.5 -1.94 +0.58 0.922 48.6% +31 -174 -152 41.9% -0.48 25–25 (50%) 23–36 (39%) 93.3 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.