H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Arnaud Boetsch vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-0
Arnaud Boetsch holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Roig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1992 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-4 6-2 6-2 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Boetsch | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |