H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Arnaud Clement vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #107 6-0 6-1 Arnaud Clement #138 Match data May 6, 2012 Q1 Q Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arnaud Clement Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Arnaud Clement Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arnaud Clement Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.