H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2010 Metz round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #75 6-4 6-2 Arnaud Clement #60 Match data Sep 23, 2010* R32 Metz ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,975 302 315 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,642 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,621 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2000 36–26 58.1% #18 1,908 0 1 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,815 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,817 0 2 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2004 14–22 38.9% #106 1,629 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,738 0 2 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,798 0 4 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,702 0 4 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,752 0 4 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,682 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,664 0 4 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,635 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Arnaud Clement Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1997 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1998 6 11 17 35.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2000 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2001 24 13 37 64.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2002 12 13 25 48.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2003 11 9 20 55.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2004 10 11 21 47.6% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2005 13 11 24 54.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2006 18 11 29 62.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2007 10 16 26 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2008 4 10 14 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2010 9 17 26 34.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 174 171 345 50.4% 39 63 102 38.2% 50 43 93 53.8% 39 38 77 50.6% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 337/342 of Arnaud Clement's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Arnaud Clement Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2003 50/51 5.3 2.4 56.3% 72.5% 51.6% 59.7% 42.5% 63.4% 41.1% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2004 34/36 5.1 2.9 56.2% 73.7% 51.8% 56.0% 33.6% 64.0% 35.1% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2005 36/37 5.8 2.8 56.0% 71.9% 48.2% 54.6% 38.3% 61.3% 36.8% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2006 47/47 5.0 1.8 58.2% 71.5% 53.6% 59.9% 42.8% 64.2% 38.9% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2007 49/49 5.5 2.7 55.7% 76.5% 51.9% 56.5% 37.6% 65.5% 35.4% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2008 27/27 6.6 2.9 55.3% 69.9% 50.4% 58.8% 36.1% 61.2% 35.6% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2009 34/34 3.7 2.4 58.5% 69.9% 47.9% 61.1% 34.3% 60.9% 35.4% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2010 39/39 4.9 2.2 56.4% 71.2% 49.4% 56.4% 40.5% 61.5% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 16/17 5.4 3.1 55.9% 72.6% 47.9% 55.7% 48.7% 61.9% 35.9% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2012 5/5 7.2 3.8 56.0% 67.5% 50.4% 60.1% 46.1% 60.1% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 337/617 5.3 2.5 56.6% 72.3% 50.7% 57.9% 39.3% 62.9% 36.9% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Arnaud Clement Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1643 133.3 — — — — +9 -121 +17 51.0% -0.10 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — -0.09 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 1998 1621 130.3 — — — — +9 -116 +11 38.7% -0.84 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) — -0.69 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 1999 1690 140.1 — — — — +9 -132 -67 46.7% -0.25 7–8 (47%) 3–14 (18%) — -1.51 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2000 1908 149.1 — — — — +8 -337 -276 53.6% +0.22 13–10 (57%) 14–6 (70%) — -3.08 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2001 1769 139.6 — — — — +46 -229 -124 53.9% +0.37 10–10 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +2.18 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2002 1816 141.6 — — — — -24 -227 -73 58.3% +0.51 2–9 (18%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.05 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2003 1817 139.0 +0.67 +2.97 1.121 52.0% +5 -123 -16 59.7% +0.47 9–10 (47%) 15–9 (63%) — +1.58 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2004 1629 133.4 0.00 +0.38 0.975 49.6% +56 -24 +123 43.3% -0.29 2–9 (18%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.33 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2005 1738 137.6 -0.72 +0.35 0.950 49.4% +9 -121 — 48.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 7–3 (70%) — -1.41 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2006 1799 148.4 +2.29 +2.03 1.088 51.4% +25 -189 -88 54.4% +0.34 9–7 (56%) 13–5 (72%) — -2.40 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2007 1703 139.6 +1.15 +1.02 1.026 50.2% -17 -108 +106 46.7% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 10–21 (32%) — -1.44 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2008 1636 123.7 -1.41 -0.99 0.918 48.5% -40 -110 +244 43.4% -0.58 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.32 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2009 1752 136.1 -1.61 -0.33 0.906 48.7% +30 -187 -8 41.4% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.79 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2010 1683 138.5 -1.51 -0.46 0.921 48.6% -9 -122 +106 39.4% -0.55 5–6 (45%) 2–12 (14%) — -1.72 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2011 1664 121.1 -0.97 -0.87 0.941 49.4% -38 — +109 43.2% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.04 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2012 1635 110.9 -1.82 +1.02 0.937 49.0% +18 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 0–2 — +0.01 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1975 144.3 -0.01 +0.76 0.995 50.0% +9 -159 +20 49.2% -0.04 86–111 (44%) 118–114 (51%) 95.7 -1.52 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.