H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 3-2

Arnaud Clement holds a 3–2 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Clement leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2005 Washington second round 6-1 3-6 6-3.

FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2005* Washington ATP 250 R64 Hard Arnaud Clement #117 6-1 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #85 Match data
May 14, 2003* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Arnaud Clement #37 6-4 6-2 Nicolas Lapentti #46 Match data
Jul 3, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Nicolas Lapentti #27 3-6 7-5 2-6 7-5 6-3 Arnaud Clement #38 Match data
Oct 18, 2001* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Nicolas Lapentti #30 4-6 6-2 7-5 Arnaud Clement #13 Match data
Jan 21, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Arnaud Clement #54 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 4-1 (ret.) Nicolas Lapentti #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4