H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Arnaud Clement vs Rik De Voest H2H: 0-1
Rik De Voest holds a 1–0 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rik De Voest leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rik De Voest won the 2008 Metz third round 4-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Rik De Voest | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Arnaud Clement | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Clement | #576 | #10 | 2,025 | 1,972 | 300 | 313 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,693 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arnaud Clement | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1997 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #104 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #18 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #17 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #31 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #106 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #54 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #93 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,681 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #152 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #295 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |