H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Arnaud Clement vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 2-3

Thomas Enqvist holds a 3–2 lead over Arnaud Clement in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Arnaud Clement leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arnaud Clement won the 2003 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Arnaud Clement
FRA Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Arnaud Clement #36 6-3 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #100 Match data
Aug 26, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 7-6(2) 6-1 Arnaud Clement #35 Match data
Aug 13, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Thomas Enqvist #8 6-2 6-2 Arnaud Clement #50 Match data
Jan 6, 2000* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Enqvist #4 6-3 6-4 Arnaud Clement #56 Match data
Aug 4, 1999* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Arnaud Clement #72 6-4 2-6 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Arnaud Clement #576 #10 2,025 1,972 300 313 48.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Arnaud Clement Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1997 11–9 55.0% #94 1,657 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1998 13–25 34.2% #104 1,624 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1999 22–25 46.8% #56 1,690 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 2000 35–25 58.3% #18 1,908 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2001 31–25 55.4% #17 1,768 0 1 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2002 29–23 55.8% #38 1,822 0 1 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2003 31–20 60.8% #31 1,819 0 2 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2004 13–21 38.2% #106 1,630 0 2 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2005 18–19 48.6% #69 1,737 0 2 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2006 27–20 57.4% #42 1,797 0 4 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2007 23–26 46.9% #54 1,703 0 4 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2008 10–17 37.0% #93 1,636 0 4 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2009 14–20 41.2% #63 1,750 0 4 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2010 15–24 38.5% #78 1,681 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2011 6–11 35.3% #152 1,661 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2012 2–3 40.0% #295 1,632 0 4 — — — — — — —