H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Artem Sitak vs Thomas Fabbiano

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Artem Sitak vs Thomas Fabbiano.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Artem Sitak
NZL Age 40 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Artem Sitak #1382 3-6 6-4 6-3 Thomas Fabbiano #170 Match data Sep 28, 2015 Q2 Q Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Artem Sitak #1,161 #299 182 1,516 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Artem Sitak Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2011 0–1 0.0% #434 1,426 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Artem Sitak Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 2/2 of Artem Sitak's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Artem Sitak Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2011 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.0% 50.0% 41.7% 63.6% — 45.0% 8.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2017 1/1 4.0 2.0 55.4% 74.2% 44.0% 50.0% — 60.7% 19.6% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
Career — 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.7% 62.1% 42.8% 56.8% — 52.9% 14.1% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Artem Sitak Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2008 1445 89.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1428 93.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1406 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2011 1426 97.3 -0.30 -3.35 0.156 31.6% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.02 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 1457 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2014 1481 107.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2015 1500 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2016 1453 93.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 2017 1448 101.8 -0.37 -1.01 0.498 42.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.02 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
38 2024 1437 92.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1516 93.4 -0.34 -2.18 0.298 36.9% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — 0.00 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.