H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 10:33 UTC
Arthur Rinderknech vs David Goffin H2H: 1-2
David Goffin holds a 2–1 lead over Arthur Rinderknech in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while David Goffin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Arthur Rinderknech won the 2025 China Open third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 30
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2025* | China Open | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Arthur Rinderknech | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2025* | China Open | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-3 6-2 | Arthur Rinderknech | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2024* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Goffin | 6-3 6-3 | Arthur Rinderknech | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2024* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Goffin | 6-4 6-4 | Arthur Rinderknech | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Rinderknech | #28 | #24 | 1,776 | 1,905 | 109 | 120 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arthur Rinderknech | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #44 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #96 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #29 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |