H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Brian Fairlie H2H: 1-0
Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Brian Fairlie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1979 Nice fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 78
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1979* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-3 7-6 | Brian Fairlie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Brian Fairlie | #332 | #24 | 0 | 1,916 | 233 | 220 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Brian Fairlie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 36–20 | 64.3% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 20–29 | 40.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 13–27 | 32.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #58 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #66 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #36 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #92 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #332 | 1,607 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |