H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Eddie Dibbs H2H: 0-4
Eddie Dibbs holds a 4–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1979 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1979* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-4 6-4 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1979* | North Conway | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1978* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Eddie Dibbs | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
| Jun 8, 1975* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-3 6-4 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Eddie Dibbs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 |