H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Balazs Taroczy vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 3-5

Ilie Nastase holds a 5–3 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Ilie Nastase leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1982 Hilversum quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Ilie Nastase
ROU Age 79 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 24, 1982* Hilversum ATP 250 QF Clay Balazs Taroczy #23 6-4 6-2 Ilie Nastase #93 Match data
Apr 8, 1982* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R32 Clay Balazs Taroczy #12 1-6 6-4 6-4 Ilie Nastase #87 Match data
Nov 28, 1981* Bologna ATP 250 QF Carpet Ilie Nastase #69 7-5 2-6 7-6 Balazs Taroczy #15 Match data
Oct 15, 1978* Barcelona ATP 250 F Clay Balazs Taroczy #26 1-6 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-4 Ilie Nastase #17 Match data
Aug 28, 1976* South Orange ATP 250 SF Clay Ilie Nastase #6 2-6 6-1 6-2 Balazs Taroczy #31 Match data
Aug 23, 1975* South Orange ATP 250 QF Clay Ilie Nastase #7 6-2 6-3 Balazs Taroczy #74 Match data
Apr 12, 1975* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Ilie Nastase #7 6-7 6-0 6-2 Balazs Taroczy #53 Match data
Nov 2, 1972* Paris Indoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Ilie Nastase 6-1 7-6 Balazs Taroczy Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,003 381 228 62.6% 0 0 0 0 13 13
Ilie Nastase #1,075 #1 0 2,260 859 331 72.2% 2 4 3 0 55 64

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Balazs Taroczy Ilie Nastase
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,811 0 1 1968 41–14 74.5% — 1,756 0 3
22 1976 37–19 66.1% #31 1,866 0 2 1969 27–22 55.1% — 1,824 0 5
23 1977 38–23 62.3% #32 1,852 0 2 1970 60–20 75.0% — 1,970 0 7
24 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,907 0 4 1971 73–13 84.9% — 2,079 0 14
25 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,812 0 6 1972 106–20 84.1% — 2,157 1 25
26 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,931 0 9 1973 118–17 87.4% #1 2,208 2 41
27 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,937 0 11 1974 80–21 79.2% #10 2,153 2 48
28 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,859 0 13 1975 91–21 81.2% #7 2,170 2 54
29 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,781 0 13 1976 76–17 81.7% #3 2,179 2 59
30 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,748 0 13 1977 44–18 71.0% #9 2,092 2 62
31 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,643 0 13 1978 45–21 68.2% #16 2,059 2 64
32 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,641 0 13 1979 28–25 52.8% #49 1,795 2 64
33 — — — — — — — 1980 19–24 44.2% #77 1,740 2 64
34 — — — — — — — 1981 26–27 49.1% #74 1,730 2 64
35 — — — — — — — 1982 14–24 36.8% #86 1,633 2 64
36 — — — — — — — 1983 6–11 35.3% #118 1,595 2 64
37 — — — — — — — 1984 4–12 25.0% #202 1,574 2 64
38 — — — — — — — 1985 1–4 20.0% #431 1,535 2 64