H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Balazs Taroczy vs Robert Maud H2H: 0-1
Robert Maud holds a 1–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robert Maud leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robert Maud won the 1974 Wimbledon first round 4-6 4-6 9-8 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Robert Maud | 4-6 4-6 9-8 6-2 6-4 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Balazs Taroczy | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |