H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Daniel Brands H2H: 2-0
Benjamin Becker holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Benjamin Becker leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2010 Bangkok quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2010* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 6-4 6-2 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 7-6(1) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |