H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Benjamin Becker vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-2

Frank Dancevic holds a 2–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frank Dancevic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Indianapolis round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #121 6-2 7-5 Benjamin Becker #45 Match data Jul 23, 2009* R16 Indianapolis ATP 250 Hard
Frank Dancevic #109 6-4 6-3 Benjamin Becker #47 Match data Jul 26, 2007* R32 Indianapolis International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benjamin Becker Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0
33 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benjamin Becker Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benjamin Becker Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9% 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8% 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0% 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
33 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benjamin Becker Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.