H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 0-2
Frank Dancevic holds a 2–0 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frank Dancevic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Indianapolis fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2009 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-2 7-5 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2007 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Frank Dancevic | 6-4 6-3 | Benjamin Becker | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |