H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Benjamin Becker vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-1

Benjamin Becker and Kevin Kim are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2007 Miami Open first round 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Kim #130 6-4 3-6 6-2 Benjamin Becker #43 Match data Mar 21, 2007* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Benjamin Becker #57 7-6(4) 6-3 Kevin Kim #96 Match data Jan 28, 2007 RR Delray Beach Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benjamin Becker Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benjamin Becker Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's and 122/122 of Kevin Kim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benjamin Becker Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2% 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6% — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benjamin Becker Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98
27 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13
28 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68
29 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72
31 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.