H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Benjamin Becker vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-0

Benjamin Becker holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2014 Atlanta round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benjamin Becker #66 6-4 6-2 Matthew Ebden #86 Match data Jul 24, 2014* R32 Atlanta ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benjamin Becker Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 — — — — — — — 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
32 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benjamin Becker Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
31 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's and 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benjamin Becker Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0% 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9% 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8% 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
32 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4% 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8% 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
35 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benjamin Becker Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
35 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.