H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Benjamin Becker vs Robert Smeets H2H: 1-0
Benjamin Becker holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Smeets in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2008 Adelaide third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 40
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2008* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Benjamin Becker | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Robert Smeets | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robert Smeets | #1,177 | #146 | 426 | 1,555 | 1 | 8 | 11.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benjamin Becker | Robert Smeets | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |