H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Benoit Paire vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2016 Hamburg Open first round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Benoit Paire
France Age 37 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #156 7-5 3-6 6-4 Benoit Paire #23 Match data Jul 14, 2016* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Benoit Paire #862 #18 1,805 1,951 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Benoit Paire Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2010 1–4 20.0% #152 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2011 5–10 33.3% #95 1,603 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2012 26–26 50.0% #47 1,781 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2013 32–30 51.6% #26 1,786 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2014 10–19 34.5% #118 1,718 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2015 25–17 59.5% #19 1,924 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2016 23–32 41.8% #47 1,716 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2017 31–31 50.0% #41 1,785 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2018 26–28 48.1% #52 1,811 0 1 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2019 34–28 54.8% #24 1,818 0 3 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2020 8–12 40.0% #28 1,709 0 3 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2021 13–28 31.7% #46 1,659 0 3 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2022 4–22 15.4% #179 1,594 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2023 0–4 0.0% #117 1,585 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2024 2–3 40.0% #415 1,508 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Benoit Paire Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2012 9 14 23 39.1% 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2013 16 17 33 48.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2015 12 9 21 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2016 13 20 33 39.4% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2017 17 18 35 48.6% 8 10 18 44.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2019 16 20 36 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2020 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2021 7 14 21 33.3% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 1 10 11 9.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 165 294 43.9% 87 101 188 46.3% 24 28 52 46.2% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 532/534 of Benoit Paire's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Benoit Paire Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2010 5/5 14.0 6.0 52.0% 73.0% 44.6% 60.9% 36.7% 59.4% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 15/15 5.7 3.6 51.3% 70.3% 45.8% 46.5% 42.7% 58.3% 36.8% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2012 52/52 7.4 4.5 51.7% 72.8% 46.8% 55.1% 38.9% 60.4% 39.6% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2013 62/62 8.7 3.8 52.4% 74.0% 47.2% 56.0% 41.6% 61.4% 38.4% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2014 29/29 9.9 4.5 51.5% 76.0% 45.2% 59.3% 40.4% 60.3% 35.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2015 42/42 7.5 4.0 52.4% 72.9% 48.6% 57.9% 46.7% 61.2% 38.6% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2016 53/55 7.9 4.7 49.6% 72.4% 46.1% 56.7% 40.9% 59.3% 37.0% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2017 62/62 8.3 4.6 52.3% 75.6% 46.2% 56.8% 47.3% 61.5% 38.8% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2018 54/54 8.9 5.5 51.0% 76.1% 44.4% 54.3% 42.8% 60.4% 38.2% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2019 62/62 9.8 6.6 51.7% 78.4% 45.7% 60.2% 41.1% 62.7% 36.9% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2020 20/20 9.8 6.2 52.9% 71.6% 43.2% 56.6% 39.1% 58.3% 35.7% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2021 41/41 8.5 7.5 52.9% 73.6% 40.1% 57.1% 43.9% 58.0% 35.8% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2022 26/26 7.4 7.8 50.9% 71.2% 39.3% 49.6% 31.7% 55.6% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 4/4 10.8 9.5 54.2% 71.6% 41.8% 55.9% 33.5% 58.3% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 5/5 6.6 7.2 57.5% 73.1% 39.0% 48.0% 37.5% 58.7% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 532/534 8.5 5.3 51.8% 74.3% 45.2% 56.2% 41.8% 60.3% 37.4% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Benoit Paire Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2008 1471 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2009 1493 103.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2010 1586 118.3 -2.12 -0.94 0.796 46.5% -23 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.04 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 1603 123.4 -3.06 +0.10 0.882 47.5% -3 +27 — 35.0% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.13 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2012 1782 142.4 -1.71 +1.64 0.998 49.9% -102 -34 -102 49.6% -0.07 9–9 (50%) 11–14 (44%) — -0.08 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2013 1786 157.4 -1.15 +1.47 0.993 50.0% -35 +83 -99 53.3% +0.10 9–11 (45%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.43 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2014 1718 134.7 -2.95 -1.19 0.905 48.0% +51 +26 -117 42.3% -0.28 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) — +0.67 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2015 1925 154.1 -1.52 +2.40 0.997 50.1% -34 +9 -319 55.0% +0.20 12–5 (71%) 9–3 (75%) — -0.04 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2016 1716 146.7 -3.57 +0.24 0.910 48.0% +10 +122 -135 43.2% -0.58 12–13 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — +2.19 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2017 1785 155.3 -2.05 +2.27 1.008 50.0% -17 +10 -39 51.7% +0.01 5–11 (31%) 17–9 (65%) — +1.95 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2018 1812 153.2 -1.98 +2.17 0.965 49.3% -13 -26 +8 48.6% -0.23 10–11 (48%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.92 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2019 1819 150.0 -1.37 +1.15 0.989 49.8% -72 +114 +30 51.9% +0.04 11–11 (50%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.26 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2020 1710 127.4 -3.57 -0.47 0.857 47.1% -1 +130 — 45.3% -0.36 6–4 (60%) 4–7 (36%) — +1.03 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2021 1659 142.0 -3.78 -1.03 0.851 47.3% +15 +77 — 36.2% -0.96 4–9 (31%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.03 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2022 1594 131.2 -5.62 -1.88 0.767 45.2% +64 +14 — 28.4% -1.51 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.83 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2023 1585 113.0 -2.53 -0.35 0.797 46.6% — -8 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2024 1508 101.4 -2.39 -0.60 0.929 48.2% — — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2025 1493 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1951 150.1 -2.39 +0.90 0.942 48.9% -20 +44 -71 46.6% -0.28 91–102 (47%) 120–117 (51%) 103.5 +0.96 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.