H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Benoit Paire vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 0-1
Jeremy Chardy holds a 1–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Hamburg third round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2019* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Benoit Paire | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |